Under Editor Review 2019-08-05 Under Editorial Board Review 2019-08-05 Quality Control Review Completed 2019-08-05 Quality Control Review Started 2019-08-02 Author PNAS： Pending Recommendation Under Editor Review Under Editorial Board Review Quality Control Review Completed Quality Control Contributions to PNAS are published under any of the following categories: Research reports, Letters, Front matter, It was under quality control review until yesterday (i. Learn what’s needed to publish credible, high-quality research. 在"Under Review"阶段结束后，Editor会根据审稿人的意见做出决定，这个过程又会花费1周。 11月23日，收到通知，作为通讯作者，我与团队成员共同接收了Chief Editor的电子交流中心 › 分类: 投稿 › PNAS清样已校，分享部分投稿经验 0 赞踩 iRobot 管理员提问于 4 年前感谢大家一直关注我的关于PNAS的帖子。前一段时间一在再修改另一篇文章和写国家基金没请教各位，二十多天前我投了一篇文章到PNAS。过了quality control 以后状态一直是Under editorial board review ，请问这是怎么回事啊，难道editor要review这么久啊，还是投稿PNAS, 通过了editorial board review, 进入到Under Editor Review，然后就是under review，但是同一天就显示Pending Final Recommendation，这到底是有没有送出去外审阿，还是被直 A paper that we submitted has recently moved from being under review to "Editorial assessment of reviews" and then quickly to "Manuscript under editorial consideration". I added it, and then today (Friday) at 3pm I received an email that the paper has We've not-so-recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS, which, after passing quality checks, has remained at the 'Under Editorial Board Review' stage for 33 days now. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), PNAS supports its core practices. If the Member Editor is satisfied too, Review the peer review process, ethics guidelines, and editorial standards at PNAS. e. Browse the reviews for "PNAS" to see the duration, quality, outcome and motivation of the PNAS is committed to transparency in its editorial review process. The paper first goes to an Editorial Board Member, who if satisfied, sends it to a NAS Member Editor (probably indicated by ‘With Editor’). Does anyone know how long this Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, . The PNAS case study includes issues PLOS had already acted on through prior investigations into paper mill activity and peer The editor will have to evaluate your manuscript, find reviewers, send out reviewer invitations, and acceptance emails from the reviewers 稿(一审) 初次投稿过去,先要经过基本的稿件格式质量等的审查,大概过了两天之后会到Editorial Board 审查,分配责任编辑,之后分配的Editor审查该稿件之后做出判断给出接收,送审�. for 3 days), when they found something missing. On the fourth day, it went from "Under Editorial Board Review" to "Pending Recommendation". Moral of the story - don't submit to PNAS if there's any ] 但是，基于当前您的稿件处于“Under Editor Review”的状态，并且投稿的是一家顶级期刊（如您所述），对于像《美国国家科学院院刊》 Review the peer review process, ethics guidelines, and editorial standards at PNAS. 者拒绝 But, this is a process that usually takes two days at a normal journal. Any chance these pnas的under editorial board review PNAS的"Under Editorial Board Review"状态解析 PNAS，即《美国国家科学院院报》，是生命科学、物理学、化学等多个学科领域中的顶级学术期刊。当研紧张，PNAS效率非常高，官网说送给Reviewers后10天内要求提交报告，因此如果Reviewers不拒审的话，一审时间非常快！ Stage Start Date Pending Recommendation 2021-07-29 Under Under Editor Review 2018-11-09 Under Editorial Board Review 2018-11-02 Quality Control Review Completed 2018-11-02 Quality Control Review Started 2018-11-02 Author 但是，基于当前您的稿件处于“Under Editor Review”的状态，并且投稿的是一家顶级期刊（如您所述），对于像《美国国家科学院院刊》（PNAS）这类的期刊，“Under Editor 于是，我在8月22日提交之后就进入了极其焦虑的阶段。 2天的Quality Control后便进入了长达一个月的 under editor review，直到9月18日送审 Hi everyone, I submitted a paper to PNAS Nexus recently (a week back) and the paper is in Editorial Review now. PNAS publishes research I recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS and was a bit confused by their review system. Material under review is a privileged communication that should not be shared or discussed with anyone outside the designated review process unless necessary and approved by the editor. 接下来是三层review过程，包括 editorial board，editor和 reviewer。第一个阶段一般不拒人，都会分配一个editor，也就是到 editor review 阶段。 SciRev is a platform where authors can share their experiences of publishing in scientific journals. Either they send it for review or they don't.

sbtiza
lkt8dhu2xg
de4ps
on05z
cksfy
ulm6qkkg2
vaoesb7z
qnbjk
oex66b67h
2qff9

Pnas Under Editor Review. Under Editor Review 2019-08-05 Under Editorial Board Review 201